Spinal cord and reflex arcs: monosynaptic stretch reflex, reciprocal inhibition, and pain pathways

Intuition Beginner

Reflexes are automatic responses that happen without conscious thought. When a doctor taps your knee with a hammer, your leg kicks out — this is the stretch reflex. It happens entirely in the spinal cord, bypassing the brain for speed. Pain reflexes (pulling your hand from a hot stove) work the same way.

These circuits are called reflex arcs. They have five parts: a receptor, a sensory neuron, an integration centre in the spinal cord, a motor neuron, and an effector muscle. The simplest reflexes use just one synapse; more complex ones involve interneurons that coordinate multiple muscles at once.

Visual Beginner

The diagram shows the simplest reflex in the body. Only one synapse separates the sensory signal from the motor command, making it the fastest possible reflex. Notice the inhibitory interneuron that relaxes the opposing muscle — without it, both muscles would contract at once and fight each other.

Worked example Beginner

Trace the withdrawal reflex when you step on something sharp:

1. Sharp object activates pain receptors in your foot.
2. Sensory neurons carry the signal to the spinal cord dorsal horn.
3. Inside the cord, interneurons distribute the signal:
   • Excite motor neurons to flexor muscles (pull the foot up).
   • Inhibit motor neurons to extensor muscles (relax the pushing muscles).
   • Send a branch across to the other side of the cord to excite extensor motor neurons in the opposite leg (the crossed-extensor reflex, so you do not fall over).
4. Motor neurons fire and the foot withdraws. Your other leg stiffens to support your weight.

This is a polysynaptic reflex — it uses interneurons between the sensory and motor neurons. The crossed-extensor component shows how spinal circuits coordinate both sides of the body without any input from the brain.

Check your understanding Beginner

Formal definition Intermediate+

Monosynaptic stretch reflex

The stretch reflex (myotatic reflex, deep tendon reflex) is the simplest spinal reflex. When a muscle is stretched, muscle spindles (intrafusal fibres arranged in parallel with the extrafusal contractile fibres) detect the change in length. The primary sensory endings of the spindles are wrapped by group Ia afferent fibres, which fire at a rate proportional to the rate and amplitude of stretch.

The Ia afferent enters the spinal cord via the dorsal root and monosynaptically excites alpha motor neurons innervating the same (homonymous) muscle. The result is an immediate contraction that opposes the stretch — a negative-feedback length servo. The reflex also activates Ia inhibitory interneurons that suppress alpha motor neurons to the antagonist muscle (the muscle that opposes the stretch direction). This is reciprocal inhibition: when the quadriceps contracts, the hamstrings relax, and vice versa.

The stretch reflex gain (the ratio of motor output to sensory input) is modulated by gamma motor neurons, which innervate the contractile poles of the intrafusal fibres. Gamma activation shortens the spindle poles, maintaining spindle sensitivity across a range of muscle lengths. The combined alpha-gamma co-activation during voluntary movement keeps the spindle taut and responsive even as the muscle shortens.

Golgi tendon organ reflex

The Golgi tendon organ (GTO) is a capsule of collagen fibres embedded in the tendon, innervated by group Ib afferent fibres. The GTO detects muscle tension (force), unlike the spindle which detects length. When tension rises above a threshold, the Ib afferent activates an inhibitory interneuron that suppresses the homonymous alpha motor neuron. This is a disynaptic reflex (sensory neuron, interneuron, motor neuron) that protects the muscle from excessive force.

At low tension levels, the GTO provides positive feedback to the homonymous muscle via excitatory interneurons, contributing to smooth contraction. The inhibitory pathway dominates only at high forces, creating a force-limiting safety mechanism.

Withdrawal and crossed-extensor reflexes

The withdrawal reflex (flexor reflex) is a polysynaptic reflex triggered by nociceptors (pain receptors). Nociceptive afferents (group A-delta and C fibres) enter the dorsal horn and activate interneurons across several spinal segments. The interneurons excite flexor motor neurons and inhibit extensor motor neurons on the ipsilateral (same) side, producing rapid limb withdrawal.

The crossed-extensor reflex accompanies the withdrawal reflex. Commissural interneurons carry the signal to the contralateral side of the cord, where they excite extensor motor neurons and inhibit flexor motor neurons. The opposite limb extends to support the body's weight. This bilateral coordination is entirely spinal — decerebrate and spinal animals show both reflexes intact.

Renshaw cells

Renshaw cells are inhibitory interneurons in the ventral horn that receive excitatory input from collateral branches of alpha motor neurons. When an alpha motor neuron fires, its collateral activates a Renshaw cell, which then inhibits the same motor neuron (recurrent inhibition) and its synergists. Renshaw cells prevent motor neuron over-excitation, sharpen the temporal pattern of motor output, and contribute to the regulation of motor neuron firing rates.

Ascending sensory pathways

Two major pathways carry somatosensory information from the body to the brain:

Dorsal column-medial lemniscus pathway — carries fine (discriminative) touch, vibration, and proprioception. Primary afferents enter via the dorsal root and ascend ipsilaterally in the dorsal columns (fasciculus gracilis for lower body, fasciculus cuneatus for upper body). They synapse in the gracile and cuneate nuclei of the medulla. Second-order neurons decussate as the internal arcuate fibres and ascend as the medial lemniscus to the ventral posterolateral nucleus (VPL) of the thalamus. Third-order neurons project to primary somatosensory cortex (areas 3, 1, 2).

Spinothalamic tract (anterolateral system) — carries pain, temperature, and crude touch. Primary afferents synapse in the dorsal horn (Rexed laminae I, II, V) within one or two segments of entry. Second-order neurons decussate across the anterior white commissure and ascend in the contralateral anterolateral funiculus to VPL and to intralaminar thalamic nuclei, then to somatosensory cortex and anterior cingulate cortex.

The different decussation levels of these two pathways are the basis of Brown-Sequard syndrome: a hemisection of the cord produces ipsilateral loss of fine touch and proprioception (dorsal columns have not yet crossed) and contralateral loss of pain and temperature (spinothalamic tract has already crossed) below the lesion.

Dermatomes

Each spinal nerve innervates a specific strip of skin called a dermatome. The 31 dermatomes provide a topographic map of the body surface onto the spinal cord. Clinical testing of dermatome boundaries localises spinal cord and nerve root lesions: altered sensation in a specific dermatome points to pathology at the corresponding spinal level.

Key mechanism Intermediate+

Reciprocal inhibition via Ia inhibitory interneurons

Reciprocal inhibition is the spinal mechanism that ensures antagonist muscles relax when agonist muscles contract. The mechanism operates as follows:

1. Ia afferents from muscle spindles in the agonist muscle bifurcate in the spinal cord.
2. One branch monosynaptically excites the agonist alpha motor neurons (stretch reflex).
3. The other branch excites a dedicated population of Ia inhibitory interneurons.
4. These interneurons synapse onto and inhibit the alpha motor neurons innervating the antagonist muscle.
5. The antagonist relaxes, removing resistance to the agonist's contraction.

The Ia inhibitory interneurons are glycinergic (glycine is the inhibitory neurotransmitter in the spinal cord). Strychnine poisoning blocks glycine receptors, abolishing reciprocal inhibition and producing the characteristic muscle spasms and hyperreflexia.

Reciprocal inhibition is not limited to stretch reflexes. During voluntary movement, descending corticospinal commands activate both alpha motor neurons and Ia inhibitory interneurons simultaneously, ensuring that antagonist relaxation accompanies agonist contraction in all purposeful movements.

Gamma motor neurons and the length servo

The muscle spindle faces a mechanical problem: as the extrafusal muscle fibres contract and shorten, the spindle (arranged in parallel) goes slack, and its Ia firing drops to zero. The spindle can no longer detect further changes in length. Gamma motor neurons solve this by contracting the polar regions of the intrafusal fibres, stretching the central sensory region and restoring Ia firing.

During voluntary movement, the CNS uses alpha-gamma co-activation: descending commands simultaneously activate alpha motor neurons (to produce force) and gamma motor neurons (to maintain spindle sensitivity). This co-activation implements a follow-up length servo: if the load is heavier than expected and the muscle shortens less than intended, the spindle remains stretched relative to the extrafusal fibres, Ia firing persists, and additional alpha motor neuron recruitment occurs to overcome the unexpected resistance. If the load is lighter and the muscle shortens more than intended, the spindle is unloaded, Ia firing drops, and alpha motor neuron drive decreases. The gamma system therefore provides automatic load compensation without requiring conscious adjustment.

Pain pathways: spinothalamic tract organisation

Nociceptive signals ascend through the spinothalamic tract in a somatotopically organised manner. Sacral fibres enter the tract laterally and are progressively pushed lateral as lumbar, thoracic, and cervical fibres join medially. This laminar organisation means that compressive lesions of the cord (e.g., an intramedullary tumour expanding from within) first compromise the sacral fibres on the lateral surface of the tract, producing early loss of pain and temperature sensation in the sacral dermatomes (sacral sparing is the opposite pattern — loss of pain in higher dermatomes with preserved sacral sensation — and indicates an intramedullary rather than extramedullary lesion).

The spinothalamic tract projects to multiple thalamic targets with different functional roles: VPL for sensory-discriminative aspects of pain (location, intensity, quality), and the intralaminar nuclei (centromedian, parafascicular) for the affective-motivational dimension (the unpleasantness that drives avoidance behaviour). From thalamus, pain information reaches primary and secondary somatosensory cortex (discriminative processing), the anterior cingulate cortex (affective processing), and the insular cortex (interoceptive awareness).

Exercises Intermediate+

Gate control theory and nociceptive processing Master

Nociceptor types and pain qualities

Peripheral nociceptors fall into two principal classes distinguished by fibre diameter, conduction velocity, and the quality of pain they mediate:

A-delta fibres (group III) are thinly myelinated, with diameters of 1-5 micrometres and conduction velocities of 5-30 m/s. They mediate fast, sharp, well-localised pain — the immediate "first pain" felt on tissue injury. A-delta nociceptors include mechanical nociceptors (responding to intense pressure), thermal nociceptors (activating above about 45 degrees C, the heat-pain threshold), and mechanothermal nociceptors.

C fibres (group IV) are unmyelinated, with diameters of 0.2-1.5 micrometres and conduction velocities of 0.5-2 m/s. They mediate slow, diffuse, burning pain — the "second pain" that follows seconds after injury. C-fibre nociceptors are predominantly polymodal, responding to mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimuli. Tissue damage releases a cocktail of chemical mediators (prostaglandins, bradykinin, serotonin, histamine, substance P, hydrogen ions) that sensitise C-fibre terminals, lowering their threshold and increasing their firing rate (peripheral sensitisation).

The temporal dissociation between first and second pain is directly observable: a single noxious stimulus (e.g., a hot object) produces two distinct pain sensations separated by approximately 1 second for hand-to-brain distances, reflecting the 10-60-fold difference in conduction velocity between A-delta and C fibres.

Gate control theory (Melzack and Wall, 1965)

The gate control theory proposed by Ronald Melzack and Patrick Wall in 1965 ^{[Melzack-Wall 1965]} provides a circuit model for pain modulation at the spinal level. The theory posits a "gate" in the dorsal horn that modulates nociceptive transmission before it reaches the brain:

1. Large-diameter A-beta fibres (carrying touch and vibration) and small-diameter A-delta/C fibres (carrying pain) both synapse onto a transmission cell (T cell) in the dorsal horn that projects to the spinothalamic tract.
2. A-beta fibres also excite an inhibitory interneuron (the "gate") in the substantia gelatinosa (lamina II).
3. The inhibitory interneuron suppresses the T cell, reducing nociceptive transmission.
4. A-delta and C fibres inhibit the inhibitory interneuron, disinhibiting the T cell and opening the gate.
5. The net balance of A-beta (closing the gate) versus A-delta/C (opening the gate) input determines whether nociceptive signals are transmitted or blocked.

The theory explains why rubbing an injured area reduces pain (A-beta touch input closes the gate) and why transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) provides analgesia (high-frequency, low-intensity stimulation preferentially activates A-beta fibres). Descending pathways from the periaqueductal grey, the rostral ventromedial medulla, and the descending noradrenergic and serotonergic systems provide additional gate control from the brain, implementing top-down pain modulation.

Gate control theory has been substantially revised since 1965 (the original model incorrectly placed the inhibitory interneuron as presynaptic on primary afferent terminals; modern evidence supports both presynaptic and postsynaptic inhibition, and the gate interneurons are now known to include both GABAergic and glycinergic populations). However, the core insight — that pain transmission is actively modulated at the spinal level by convergent non-nociceptive input and by descending control — remains the foundation of pain neuroscience.

Central sensitisation and neuropathic pain

Central sensitisation is an activity-dependent increase in the excitability of dorsal horn neurons, producing pain hypersensitivity that outlasts the initial stimulus. The mechanism involves:

1. Wind-up: Repeated C-fibre input at frequencies above 0.3 Hz produces progressive augmentation of dorsal horn neuron responses. Each successive stimulus produces a larger excitatory postsynaptic potential, reflecting temporal summation at the NMDA receptor. The NMDA receptor is normally blocked by a voltage-dependent magnesium ion; sustained depolarisation from repetitive C-fibre input removes the magnesium block, allowing calcium influx and intracellular signalling cascades.

2. Transcription-dependent sensitisation: Sustained nociceptive input activates intracellular kinases (PKC, PKA, ERK, CaMKII) in dorsal horn neurons, leading to phosphorylation of receptor subunits (increasing AMPA receptor responsiveness) and to transcriptional changes (upregulating dynorphin, COX-2, and various neuropeptides). This late phase (hours to days) produces a lasting shift in dorsal horn excitability.

3. Synaptic potentiation: Structural changes at dorsal horn synapses, including insertion of new AMPA receptor subunits (particularly GluA1-containing, calcium-permeable receptors), enlargement of receptive fields, and reduction in inhibitory tone (disinhibition via downregulation of GABAergic and glycinergic transmission, and via microglia-mediated collapse of the anion gradient in lamina I neurons).

Neuropathic pain arises from damage to or dysfunction of the somatosensory nervous system itself, distinct from nociceptive pain which arises from tissue damage. Common causes include diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, and peripheral nerve injuries. Neuropathic pain is characterised by allodynia (pain from normally non-painful stimuli, such as light touch) and hyperalgesia (exaggerated pain from normally mildly painful stimuli). The mechanisms include ectopic impulse generation in damaged nerve fibres (neuroma formation, ectopic sodium channel expression), sympathetic sprouting into dorsal root ganglia, and the central sensitisation mechanisms described above. Treatment differs from nociceptive pain: first-line agents are gabapentinoids (gabapentin, pregabalin, which bind alpha-2-delta subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels and reduce excitatory neurotransmitter release), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (duloxetine, venlafaxine), and tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, nortriptyline). Opioids are generally less effective for neuropathic than for nociceptive pain.

Spinal cord injury: levels and functional consequences

Spinal cord injury (SCI) produces predictable deficits determined by the level and completeness of the lesion:

Cervical injuries (C1-C8): Tetraplegia (quadriplegia) with paralysis of all four limbs and trunk. C3-C5 injuries may compromise diaphragmatic breathing (phrenic nerve, C3-C5) and require ventilatory support. C6-C7 injuries preserve shoulder and elbow function but impair wrist and hand function.

Thoracic injuries (T1-T12): Paraplegia with paralysis of the lower limbs and trunk. Upper limb function is preserved. Autonomic dysreflexia (life-threatening hypertensive episodes triggered by noxious stimuli below the lesion) occurs with injuries above T6 due to loss of supraspinal sympathetic control.

Lumbar injuries (L1-L5): Weakness or paralysis of the lower limbs with variable bowel, bladder, and sexual function. Hip flexion and knee extension may be preserved or impaired depending on the exact level.

Sacral injuries (S1-S5): Primarily affect bowel, bladder, and sexual function with relative preservation of lower limb motor function. Ankle plantarflexion and toe flexion may be weak.

Complete vs incomplete injuries are distinguished by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale. Complete injury (ASIA A) means no motor or sensory function is preserved in the sacral segments (S4-S5). Incomplete injuries (ASIA B-D) retain varying degrees of sensory and/or motor function below the lesion, and carry a substantially better prognosis for functional recovery.

Spasticity vs flaccidity distinguishes upper motor neuron (UMN) from lower motor neuron (LMN) lesions at the spinal level. UMN lesions (corticospinal tract damage rostral to the alpha motor neuron) produce spastic paralysis: increased muscle tone (velocity-dependent resistance to stretch), hyperreflexia (exaggerated deep tendon reflexes), the Babinski sign (extensor plantar response), and clonus. LMN lesions (damage to the alpha motor neuron itself or its ventral root/axons) produce flaccid paralysis: decreased muscle tone, hyporeflexia or areflexia, muscle atrophy (due to loss of trophic support), and fasciculations. At the level of a spinal cord lesion, both UMN signs (corticospinal damage) and LMN signs (destruction of the motor neurons at that segment) may coexist.

H-reflex testing

The Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) is the electrical analogue of the stretch reflex, used clinically and in research to assess spinal motor neuron excitability. A submaximal electrical stimulus to the mixed peripheral nerve (typically the tibial nerve at the popliteal fossa) preferentially activates the large-diameter Ia afferent fibres (which have lower electrical threshold than motor axons). The Ia afferent input produces a monosynaptic reflex contraction of the soleus muscle, recorded as the H-wave on EMG.

At low stimulus intensities, only the H-wave is present (sensory fibres activated, motor axons not yet recruited). As stimulus intensity increases, the direct motor response (M-wave) appears and grows, while the H-wave reaches a maximum and then declines (because supramaximal motor axon activation produces antidromic collisions in the motor axons that block the reflex). The H-reflex is normally maximal at a stimulus intensity below that which produces a maximal M-wave.

H-reflex amplitude and latency provide information about Ia afferent function, alpha motor neuron excitability, and presynaptic inhibition. The H-reflex is enhanced in spasticity (reduced presynaptic inhibition of Ia terminals) and reduced or absent in peripheral neuropathy, radiculopathy, and spinal shock.

Central pattern generators for locomotion

Spinal central pattern generators (CPGs) are neural circuits in the spinal cord that produce rhythmic, patterned motor output for locomotion without requiring continuous supraspinal input. The evidence comes from decerebrate and spinal animal preparations (Brown 1911, Grillner 1975-2000s) in which treadmill stepping persists after complete spinal transection, and from human infants who display stepping reflexes before cortical motor control is mature.

The CPG for mammalian locomotion is distributed across several spinal segments (C3-C5 for forelimb rhythmogenesis, L1-L2 for hindlimb rhythmogenesis in the cat). The core circuit consists of populations of excitatory interneurons (using glutamate) that generate the rhythm via reciprocal inhibition between flexor and extensor half-centres, modulated by pacemaker properties (persistent sodium current and calcium-activated nonspecific cation current) in individual neurons. The molecular identity of the CPG interneurons has been partially established: V0 (Dbx1-positive) commissural interneurons coordinate left-right alternation; V1 (En1-positive) interneurons set the speed of locomotion; V2a (Chx10-positive) interneurons drive extensor activity; V3 (Sim1-positive) interneurons contribute to robustness of the rhythm.

In humans, body-weight-supported treadmill training after spinal cord injury exploits the CPG: repetitive stepping practice enhances the spinal locomotor circuitry through activity-dependent plasticity, improving stepping ability even in patients with complete thoracic injuries. The clinical success of this approach confirms that the human lumbar cord contains autonomous locomotor circuitry comparable to that demonstrated in animal models.

Connections Master

Spinal reflexes are the simplest functional circuits of the nervous system and the building blocks from which all more complex motor behaviour is constructed. The monosynaptic stretch reflex and reciprocal inhibition reappear at every level of the motor hierarchy: the same excite-agonist-inhibit-antagonist pattern is implemented by corticospinal command signals during voluntary movement, by brainstem reticulospinal pathways during postural adjustments, and by cerebellar corrective output during motor learning. The spinal cord is not a passive relay — it is an active processor that integrates sensory feedback, descending commands, and intrinsic pattern-generating circuitry.

The stretch reflex connects directly to motor unit physiology 18.04.03 pending: the size principle governs which motor units the Ia afferent recruits in the monosynaptic reflex, and the reflex gain depends on the distribution of motor unit types in the muscle. The gamma motor neuron system links to proprioceptive processing in the dorsal column pathway 18.05.01, which carries muscle spindle input to the cortex for conscious position sense.

The pain pathways of this unit — spinothalamic tract, dorsal column-medial lemniscus, gate control circuitry — provide the sensory foundation for understanding brain region integration 18.05.03 pending. The somatosensory cortex receives both the discriminative component of pain (via VPL to S1/S2) and the affective component (via intralaminar nuclei to anterior cingulate and insular cortex). These dual pain pathways explain why pain is both a sensory event (where, how intense) and an emotional one (how unpleasant, how urgent).

The crossed-extensor reflex and the locomotor CPGs are the precursors of the brainstem and cortical motor systems treated in 18.05.03 pending. The CPG provides the rhythmic substrate that supraspinal centres modulate rather than generate — the brain does not micromanage each step but adjusts the speed, direction, and adaptiveness of the spinal locomotor pattern. The transition from spinal reflex automation to cortical voluntary control is the central theme of the motor system hierarchy.

Spinal cord injury levels and the UMN versus LMN distinction connect to clinical neurology and to the corticospinal tract anatomy described in 18.05.01. The transition from spinal shock (flaccid) to spasticity after acute SCI reflects the loss of descending monoaminergic modulation and the emergence of intrinsic spinal reflex hyperexcitability — a direct consequence of the reflex circuitry formalised in this unit operating without its normal supraspinal brakes.

Historical & philosophical context Master

Charles Sherrington's The Integrative Action of the Nervous System (1906) ^{[Sherrington 1906]} established the conceptual framework for spinal reflexes that persists to this day. Sherrington introduced the terms "synapse", "reciprocal innervation", and "final common pathway" (the alpha motor neuron as the last neural element through which all motor commands pass). His decerebrate cat preparations demonstrated that the spinal cord alone could produce coordinated reflex movements, integrating excitatory and inhibitory signals across multiple segments. The 1932 Nobel Prize (shared with Edgar Adrian) recognised this work as foundational.

The monosynaptic stretch reflex was definitively characterised by David Lloyd in the 1940s using electrical recording of dorsal root and ventral root fibres. Lloyd established the latency criteria that identified the monosynaptic connection (one synaptic delay of approximately 0.5 ms) and distinguished it from polysynaptic pathways. The Ia inhibitory interneuron was identified by Jankowska and colleagues in the 1960s-70s using intracellular recording and spike-triggered averaging.

The gate control theory of pain (Melzack and Wall 1965) was a conceptual revolution that changed pain from a simple line-label system (pain receptor to pain centre) to an active modulation system. The theory predicted that stimulation of large-diameter sensory fibres could suppress pain, a prediction confirmed by the clinical success of TENS. Wall himself revised the theory substantially over the following decades, but the core principle — that nociceptive transmission is gated by convergent non-nociceptive input — remains one of the most influential ideas in pain science.

The discovery of central pattern generators overturned the assumption that all locomotor commands originate in the brain. Graham Brown's 1911 observation that decerebrate cats could produce alternating stepping movements on a treadmill, long before modern neuroscience could identify the underlying circuitry, anticipated the CPG concept by decades. The molecular-genetic dissection of CPG interneuron classes (V0, V1, V2a, V3) by Jessell, Kiehn, and colleagues in the 2000s transformed the CPG from a functional concept into a circuit with identified neuronal components and genetic markers.

The distinction between nociceptive and neuropathic pain has profound clinical and philosophical implications. Nociceptive pain is a protective alarm system — a useful signal of tissue damage. Neuropathic pain is a malfunction of the alarm system itself, producing suffering without protective function. The gate control theory and its descendants explain how the nervous system actively constructs the pain experience rather than passively receiving it, connecting to broader questions about the neural basis of consciousness and subjective experience that thread through the entire neuroscience curriculum.

Bibliography Master

1. Sherrington, C. S. — The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. Yale University Press (1906).

2. Melzack, R. & Wall, P. D. — Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 150, 971-979 (1965).

3. Lloyd, D. P. C. — Facilitation and inhibition of spinal motoneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 9, 421-438 (1946).

4. Jankowska, E. & Roberts, W. J. — Synaptic actions of single interneurones mediating short-latency reflex pathways from group Ia and Ib afferents in cat spinal cord. J. Physiol. 255, 53P-54P (1976).

5. Brown, T. G. — The intrinsic factors in the act of progression in the mammal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 84, 308-319 (1911).

6. Grillner, S. — Neurobiological bases of rhythmic motor acts in vertebrates. Science 228, 143-149 (1985).

7. Kiehn, O. — Development and functional organization of spinal locomotor circuits. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 100-109 (2011).

8. Kandel, E. R., Koester, J. D., Mack, S. H. & Siegelbaum, S. A. — Principles of Neural Science, 6th ed. McGraw-Hill (2021).

9. Sherwood, L. — Human Physiology: From Cells to Systems, 9th ed. Cengage (2016).

10. Silverthorn, D. U. — Human Physiology: An Integrated Approach, 8th ed. Pearson (2019).

11. Woolf, C. J. — Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain 152, S2-S15 (2011).