Race and ethnicity: systemic racism, intersectionality (Crenshaw), racial formation theory

Intuition Beginner

Race is not a biological fact. Geneticists have shown there is more genetic variation within any "racial" group than between groups. Yet race is profoundly real as a social category that shapes life chances, treatment, and identity. Sociologists call this a social construction: a category created by society, with consequences that are anything but imaginary.

Systemic racism refers to how racial inequality is built into institutions. Housing (redlining, segregation), education (school funding tied to property values), criminal justice (stop-and-frisk, sentencing disparities), healthcare (implicit bias in treatment), and employment (audit studies showing callbacks vary by racialized name on identical resumes — Bertrand and Mullainathan 2004). These patterns persist regardless of individual intent.

Kimberle Crenshaw coined "intersectionality" to describe how race, gender, and class overlap in ways that cannot be understood separately. Black women face discrimination that is neither just racism nor just sexism. Eduardo Bonilla-Silva argues that modern racism operates without racial slurs through "color-blind" frames — abstract liberalism, naturalization, cultural racism, and minimization.

Visual Beginner

The tables below map the core concepts of this unit to their theorists and to the institutions through which systemic racism operates.

Concept	What it means	Key source
Social construction of race	Race has no biological basis but real social consequences	AAA 1998 statement
Systemic racism	Racial inequality built into institutions	Bonilla-Silva
Intersectionality	Race, gender, and class overlap and cannot be separated	Crenshaw 1989
Color-blind racism	Racism operates through "neutral" frames	Bonilla-Silva
Racial formation	Race is a process, not a fixed category	Omi and Winant

Institution	Mechanism of racial inequality
Housing	Redlining, restrictive covenants, white flight
Education	School funding tied to local property values
Criminal justice	Stop-and-frisk, sentencing disparities, mass incarceration
Healthcare	Implicit bias, unequal treatment
Employment	Callback gaps on otherwise identical resumes

Race organizes who lives where, who is policed, who gets hired, and who accumulates wealth across generations. The institutions do not need individual racists to produce racial gaps; they reproduce patterns set decades or centuries ago.

Worked example Beginner

In 2004, Marianne Bertrand and Sendhil Mullainathan sent out nearly 5,000 resumes in response to job ads in Boston and Chicago. The resumes were identical in every way except the applicant's name. Some received typically White-sounding names (Emily, Greg). Others received typically Black-sounding names (Lakisha, Jamal).

The result: resumes with White-sounding names received 50% more callbacks for interviews. A Black applicant had to send roughly 15 resumes to get one callback; a White applicant needed only 10. The gap held across occupation, industry, and employer size.

No employer used a racial slur. No single hiring manager acted from conscious malice. Yet a measurable racial gap emerged across thousands of employers — a clean demonstration of how systemic racial disadvantage can operate without any individual acting out of prejudice.

What this tells us. Systemic racism is not about bad individuals. It is about patterns in how institutions distribute opportunities, patterns that can persist even when everyone involved believes they are being fair.

Check your understanding Beginner

Formal definition Intermediate+

Race as a social construction. The American Anthropological Association's 1998 statement concluded that race has no defensible biological basis: human genetic variation is clinal (gradual and continuous) rather than clustered into discrete groups, and within-group variation exceeds between-group variation for any plausible grouping. Yet race is real as a social category — it organizes how people are treated, how resources are distributed, and how identities form. A category can be socially constructed and still have powerful consequences; money and citizenship are also social constructions. The contemporary problem is not whether race is "real" (it is real, in the only way that matters for sociology — through its effects) but how a socially constructed category distributes life chances so reliably across generations ^{[AAA 1998]}.

Ethnicity is a shared cultural heritage — common language, religion, ancestry, history, or national origin — that distinguishes a group (Italian Americans, Korean Americans, Armenian Americans). Race and ethnicity overlap but differ: race is imposed from outside through perceived physical traits; ethnicity is often claimed from within through cultural practice.

Minority group in sociology means a group subordinate in power and privilege, not necessarily fewer in number. Women are a minority group in this sense in many contexts; Black South Africans were a numerical majority under apartheid while being a sociological minority group.

Prejudice is an attitude — a rigid, usually unfavorable, judgment about a group. Discrimination is behavior — unequal treatment of people based on their group membership. Prejudice can exist without discrimination (a manager who privately distrusts a group but hires them anyway), and discrimination can exist without prejudice (a landlord who holds no prejudiced beliefs but enforces a credit-score threshold that correlates with race).

Individual discrimination is one person's unequal treatment of another. Institutional discrimination is unequal treatment built into the routine operations of institutions — schools, banks, courts, employers. The latter is harder to see and harder to attribute to any single actor, and it is typically the larger source of racial disadvantage.

Racial formation theory (Omi and Winant)

Omi and Winant's central claim is that race is a process, not a fixed category. Racial meanings are created, contested, and transformed over time through racial projects — efforts to organize and distribute resources along racial lines while simultaneously interpreting, representing, and explaining racial dynamics. A racial project can be racist (if it creates or reproduces structures of domination based on racial signification) or anti-racist. The extension of racial meaning to a previously unorganized social relationship is racialization: the Irish, Italians, and Jews were each racialized as non-White at different points in US history before being absorbed into whiteness. Because race is historically produced rather than biologically given, the racial categories that appear natural in one era can dissolve or re-form in another ^{[Omi and Winant 2015]}.

Institutional analysis Intermediate+

The concepts above are best understood through the institutions in which they operate. The sections that follow trace systemic racism through housing, wealth, incarceration, and policing, then return to the interpretive frames — intersectionality, color-blind ideology, white privilege — through which analysts make sense of the patterns.

Residential segregation

Massey and Denton's American Apartheid (1993) documents how segregation was engineered, not accidental. The Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) produced "residential security" maps in the 1930s that color-coded neighborhoods by lending risk; neighborhoods with Black residents were marked red ("hazardous"), a practice called redlining. Restrictive covenants barred selling property to Black buyers; federal mortgage policy explicitly refused to insure integrated neighborhoods; white flight drained tax bases from urban cores. The result was the hypersegregation of Black Americans in inner cities — a degree of segregation unmatched by any European immigrant group. The maps were retired, but the wealth and credit patterns they inscribed persisted, because the homes families had been permitted to buy in the 1940s and 1950s were the asset base on which everything since has compounded.

The racial wealth gap

Oliver and Shapiro's Black Wealth/White Wealth (1995) shows that the racial wealth gap cannot be explained by income, education, or family structure. Median White household wealth remains roughly ten times median Black household wealth. Wealth is built over generations through homeownership appreciation, inheritance, and access to credit — channels from which Black families were systematically excluded. Equalizing income today does not equalize wealth tomorrow, because the asset base was set across centuries of exclusion. Wealth gaps, built slowly, do not close quickly; this is why the racial wealth gap is an order of magnitude larger than the racial income gap for families with otherwise comparable profiles.

Mass incarceration

Michelle Alexander's The New Jim Crow (2010) argues that mass incarceration functions as a racialized caste system: felony disenfranchisement, employment discrimination against the formerly incarcerated, and housing exclusion reproduce the subordinate status formally ended by the civil rights movement. The United States incarcerates Black men at roughly five times the rate of White men; the War on Drugs, despite similar rates of drug use across racial groups, was enforced overwhelmingly in communities of color. Alexander's thesis is structural rather than conspiratorial: no single actor designed the system to produce a racial caste, but the cumulative effect of policing choices, sentencing laws, and post-release exclusions is to do exactly that ^{[Alexander 2010]}.

Racialized policing

The Stanford Open Policing Project (Pierson et al. 2020) analyzed nearly 100 million traffic stops and found that Black drivers were stopped more often than White drivers, even after controlling for the amount of time drivers spent on the road. The gap was larger during daylight hours, when officers could more easily see a driver's race before the stop, and shrank after dark — a pattern consistent with discrimination in the decision to stop. The methodological move (using the daylight-darkness contrast as a natural experiment on the visibility of race) is one of the cleaner ways to separate the effect of race from the effect of driving behavior in observational data.

Intersectionality (Crenshaw)

Crenshaw's 1989 article Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex exposed how anti-discrimination law treated race and gender as separate, mutually exclusive categories. In DeGraffenreid v. General Motors (1976), Black women plaintiffs alleged they were discriminated against as Black women; the court dismissed the claim because GM had hired Black men (no race discrimination) and White women (no gender discrimination), so by the law's single-axis logic there was no discrimination against Black women. Crenshaw's point is structural: Black women's experience is not racism added to sexism but a distinct form of disadvantage that single-axis frameworks render invisible. Patricia Hill Collins extends this into the matrix of domination, showing how race, gender, class, sexuality, and nation interlock in producing both oppression and privilege, and how any single axis is an abstraction from a more complex whole ^{[Crenshaw 1989]}.

Color-blind racism (Bonilla-Silva)

Bonilla-Silva's Racism Without Racists (2003) argues that contemporary racial ideology has adapted to civil-rights norms by going "color-blind." He identifies four frames through which color-blind racism operates:

• Abstract liberalism — invoking equal opportunity to oppose race-targeted policies ("I didn't get the job, it should go to whoever is most qualified"), while ignoring the unequal starting line that makes the policy necessary.
• Naturalization — treating segregation as a natural preference ("people just prefer their own kind"), so that a politically produced outcome is re-described as biology.
• Cultural racism — attributing racial gaps to cultural deficits ("they don't value education"), relocating structural inequality into the supposedly defective culture of the disadvantaged group.
• Minimization — claiming discrimination is a thing of the past ("discrimination is in the past, get over it"), so that present disparities are treated as evidence of present merit.

These frames let speakers deny racial significance while reproducing racial outcomes. The ideology does not require speakers to hold prejudiced beliefs; it requires them to use socially available vocabularies that happen to rationalize the racial order. The frames are analytically separable but often appear together in the same utterance, which is why Bonilla-Silva and Forman's interview-based work treats them as a repertory rather than as fixed positions.

White privilege

Peggy McIntosh's White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack (1988) enumerates the unearned advantages of whiteness — the freedom to be in a group without representing one's race, to find bandages in one's own skin color, to assume skin color will not count against a loan application. W. E. B. Du Bois called this the psychological wage of whiteness: White workers accepted lower material wages than solidarity with Black workers would have won, in exchange for a compensatory public and psychological status. David Roediger's The Wages of Whiteness (1991) develops this account historically, showing how whiteness was built as an identity in the nineteenth century as working-class Europeans were admitted to a racial category that distinguished them from enslaved Black labor. White privilege is the inversion of racial disadvantage: not a separate phenomenon but the other side of the same structure.

Exercises Intermediate

Advanced analysis Master

Race science and its debunking

The project of ranking races by intelligence has a long and discredited history. Samuel George Morton's nineteenth-century measurements of skull capacity, intended to show a racial hierarchy, were reanalyzed by Stephen Jay Gould in The Mismeasure of Man (1981), who found that Morton's results were shaped by unconscious bias in how skulls were selected, measured, and aggregated — a case study in how data collection can embody the hypothesis it pretends to test. The IQ-testing movement, imported from Binet's work in France and re-engineered in the United States to support immigration restriction, was used to justify sterilization and restrictive policy until its methodological flaws (cultural loading of items, conflation of inherited and environmental sources of variance) were exposed. Herrnstein and Murray's The Bell Curve (1994) revived the claim of genetically based racial IQ differences; the American Psychological Association's 1996 report Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns concluded that there was no direct evidence for the claim and that the observed score gaps were consistent with environmental explanations. The refutation did not retire the political uses of race science, which recur whenever the gap between racial outcomes needs a non-structural explanation; it did retire the empirical case for them.

Racial identity development

William Cross's Nigrescence model traces the development of a healthy Black racial identity through stages: pre-encounter (race seen as unimportant, often a de-raced worldview), encounter (an event forces racial awareness), immersion-emersion (intense embrace of Black identity, often alongside anger at whiteness), internalization (a secure, confident Black identity), and internalization-commitment (racial identity becomes the base for sustained action). Janet Helms developed a parallel model for White racial identity development, tracing the move from contact, through disintegration and reintegration (the conflict and defense that come with acknowledging one's whiteness), pseudo-independence, immersion-emersion, to autonomy — an identity that acknowledges whiteness without needing it to be superior. Beverly Daniel Tatum's Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? (1997) applies these models to school settings, arguing that same-race peer groups in adolescence are a developmental response to a racialized environment, not a failure of integration. The developmental framing matters because it refuses the deficit reading (that racial clustering among Black students indicates pathology) and locates the phenomenon in the normal trajectory of forming a racial identity in a society organized by race.

Critical race theory

Critical Race Theory (CRT), emerging from legal scholarship in the late 1970s and 1980s, rests on several commitments: racism is ordinary, not aberrational; interest convergence (Bell) explains racial progress — gains for minority groups occur when they align with the interests of Whites; race is socially constructed; and counterstorytelling is a legitimate method of analysis, foregrounding the experiential knowledge of those the dominant legal order has excluded. Derrick Bell's Faces at the Bottom of the Well (1992) argues that racism is permanent rather than eradicable, a claim intended to ground analysis in structural realism rather than optimistic incrementalism. Delgado and Stefancic's primer summarizes the movement's commitments; Crenshaw, Gotanda, Peller, and Thomas's Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement (1995) collects the foundational texts. Ladson-Billings and Tate extended CRT to education, arguing that curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment are racialized structures. The relation between CRT as an academic legal tradition and the political uses of the term in the 2020s is a nontrivial matter; they are not the same thing, and conflating them obscures both.

Intersectionality: evolution and methods

Crenshaw's original 1989 article was a legal argument; the concept has since become a paradigm across disciplines. Collins's Black Feminist Thought (1990) gave intersectionality a sociological foundation in standpoint epistemology and the matrix of domination. Hancock and others argue intersectionality is not a variable to be added to a model but a paradigm that reorients what is being explained. Bowleg's methodological work documents the difficulty of operationalizing intersectionality in quantitative research: standard regression models force race and gender into separate main effects, and their interaction term (if included) answers a different question than intersectionality asks, because the interaction assumes the axes combine additively rather than constituting a distinct category of experience. Bauer's work in public health shows the cost of ignoring this: health disparities aggregated at the level of "Black women" conceal differences by sexuality, class, and immigrant status that point to different causes and require different interventions. The methodological challenge is that the unit of analysis intersectionality names — the intersection itself — is exactly what standard variable-based methods are designed to pull apart.

Race, genetics, and medicine

The relation between race and genetics is contested in medicine. Race-based medicine — dosing or diagnosing by race — was epitomized by BiDil, approved by the FDA in 2005 as the first race-specific drug (a fixed-dose combination for heart failure marketed for Black patients), despite the genetic incoherence of the racial category and the absence of any mechanistic reason the drug should work only in one group. The trial that secured approval had enrolled only self-identified Black patients, so the evidence could not distinguish a racial effect from a population effect. Pharmacogenomics — dosing by genotype — is the alternative: sickle cell trait, historically treated as a "Black disease," is in fact a malaria adaptation common in regions of malarial pressure across West Africa, the Mediterranean, the Middle East, and parts of India. Ancestry (a population-genetic concept tracking allele frequencies) and race (a social category tracking the sorting a society performs) are not interchangeable; using the latter as a proxy for the former imports social categories into biological questions where they do not belong.

Whiteness studies

If race is constructed, whiteness is constructed too — and historically recent. Noel Ignatiev's How the Irish Became White (1995) traces how Irish immigrants, racialized as non-White on arrival, negotiated entry into whiteness through labor politics and anti-Black solidarity. Karen Brodkin's How Jews Became White Folks (1998) places a similar arc in the postwar GI Bill and suburbanization, which admitted Jews and other European ethnics into the mass middle class from which Black Americans were excluded. Haney Lopez's White by Law (1996) analyzes the racial prerequisite cases — court decisions in the early twentieth century in which immigrants petitioned for naturalization by arguing they were legally "white" or "Caucasian." Takao Ozawa, a Japanese American whose petition was denied despite his argument that whiteness should be about skin color, and Bhagat Singh Thind, whose petition was denied despite the argument that high-caste North Indians were Caucasian, produced rulings whose reasoning was openly inconsistent, because the category being applied had no defensible content. Whiteness was a legal construction whose shape shifted to preserve the exclusion it was designed to perform.

Latinx and comparative racial systems

Racial systems vary across the Americas. The United States historically imposed a rigid binary (one drop of Black "blood" made one Black); Brazil developed a more fluid system with dozens of color categories and high rates of racial intermarriage. Yet comparative research (Telles's Pigmentocracies, 2014) finds that fluidity does not imply equality: pigmentocracy — stratification by skin tone — operates in both systems, and Latin American societies that deny having racism still show systematic disadvantage by color. Mestizaje, the ideology of racial mixture, can function as a color-blind frame: by celebrating mixture, it refuses to name the racial hierarchy that mixture leaves intact. Latin American immigration into the United States has produced its own racialization processes, as the census category "Hispanic" (an ethnicity, not a race) interacts awkwardly with the racial categories it overlays, and as Latinx populations are sorted into a US racial system that was not built to receive them.

Asian American sociology

The model minority myth frames Asian Americans as high-achieving, disciplined, and racially uncomplaining — a frame that functions to deny structural racism (if one minority "made it," the implication runs, others could too) and to obscure the heterogeneity of Asian American populations, whose national-origin groups differ sharply in income, education, and refugee history. Lee and Zhou's The Asian American Achievement Paradox (2015) shows that the high educational outcomes of some Asian American groups reflect ethnic-specific institutional resources (after-school programs, immigrant networks) and the selective immigration policy that admitted highly educated arrivals, not cultural traits intrinsic to "Asians." The bamboo ceiling refers to the under-representation of Asian Americans in executive and leadership positions despite high representation in professional ranks — a pattern consistent with racialized stereotypes about assertiveness and "fit" that penalize the same compliance the model minority myth celebrates. Nativist exclusion (the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882; Japanese American incarceration) is the historical baseline against which contemporary Asian American position must be read.

Settler colonialism and Indigenous studies

Settler colonialism is, in Patrick Wolfe's formulation, a structure, not an event: it does not end when the initial dispossession is complete but persists as an ongoing organization of land, governance, and identity around the elimination of the Native. Tuck and Yang's Decolonization Is Not a Metaphor (2012) argues that "decolonization" has been borrowed as a generic term for liberation or inclusion, which evacuates it of its specific content — the repatriation of Indigenous land and life. Eve Tuck's broader methodological work distinguishes damage-centered research (which documents Indigenous communities through the lens of harm and deficit) from desire-based research (which takes Indigenous futures and self-determination as its object). The framework sits in productive tension with the race-ethnicity framing of this unit: settler colonialism is not one axis of inequality among others but a structure through which the categories of indigeneity, Blackness, and whiteness were co-constituted in the settler state. Reading the two together is harder than choosing between them, but neither alone is adequate to the history they share.

Measuring racial attitudes

Empirical measurement of contemporary racial attitudes has produced several converging instruments. The modern racism scale (McConahay 1986), the symbolic racism tradition (Sears and Henry), and the racial resentment scale (Kinder and Sanders 1996) all attempt to capture the form of prejudice that survives the social prohibition on open racial animus — a blend of antiblack affect and individualist values ("Black people should work their way up without special favors"). Bonilla-Silva and Forman used surveys and interviews to document the frames of color-blind racism in respondents' own reasoning. Krysan's work on the Chicago Area Study traces attitudes toward residential integration over time. The Implicit Association Test (IAT) attempts to measure implicit racial attitudes; its test-retest reliability and its predictive validity for behavior remain contested, and the strongest claims about what it measures have been substantially revised (cf. 29.07.04). The measurement debate matters because policy arguments about whether racism persists often turn on which instrument is taken as authoritative, and the instruments disagree in instructive ways.

Race and the state: census categories

The US census racial categories have been reorganized in every census, and the changes are themselves a record of racial formation in action. Native Americans were counted only after exclusion policy shifted; Asian categories splintered and aggregated as immigration patterns changed; a "Hispanic" ethnicity question was added in 1980 because no single racial category could absorb Latin American populations; a Middle Eastern/North African (MENA) category has been proposed and not adopted. Daniels's work traces these shifts, showing that the categories are administrative artifacts whose contours reflect the political projects of their moment. Haney Lopez's White by Law and subsequent work argue that race is, in significant part, a legal construction: court decisions, statutes, and administrative rules have made and remade racial categories to perform specific exclusions, and the coherence of those categories has never survived sustained scrutiny. The census does not record race so much as help produce it, year by year, in the act of counting.

Connections across the curriculum Master

This unit sits between the stratification overview (30.04.01) and the gender unit (30.04.04), and feeds several later units.

The prerequisite 30.04.01 established race as one axis of stratification alongside class, gender, caste, and global position. This unit formalizes the sociological treatment of race — racial formation, systemic racism, intersectionality, color-blind ideology — and documents the empirical record of racial disadvantage in housing, wealth, incarceration, policing, and employment.

The declared successor 30.04.04 pending takes up gender. Crenshaw's intersectionality, introduced here, is the bridge: gender stratification cannot be analyzed in isolation from race, and the unit on gender returns to the cases (employment discrimination, violence, health) where the two axes are inseparable. The single-axis critique developed against DeGraffenreid v. General Motors applies symmetrically to any framework that tries to address gender while holding race fixed.

The institutions unit 30.05.01 takes up the mechanisms — education, family, media, religion — through which racial meaning is produced and racial inequality is reproduced. The school funding, tracking, and curriculum choices documented there are the proximate sites where the systemic racism described here operates on individuals.

The deviance and social control unit 30.06.01 deepens the analysis of mass incarceration (Alexander) and racialized policing. The New Jim Crow thesis introduced here reappears there as the central object, with attention to the legal and institutional mechanics of felon exclusion and to how carceral disruption feeds back into the wealth and family-formation gaps documented here.

The urbanization and demography unit 30.08.01 covers residential segregation as a demographic and geographic phenomenon. Redlining and hypersegregation, introduced here as mechanisms of the racial wealth gap, are formalized there as spatial processes with their own dynamics, including how segregation concentrates poverty and shapes the school funding that this unit identifies as an engine of racial disadvantage in education.

The behavioral science curriculum's unit on implicit bias (29.07.04) supplies the cognitive-level mechanisms behind some of the institutional patterns documented here. The relation between implicit individual-level bias and systemic racial outcomes is a nontrivial theoretical question: implicit bias is neither necessary nor sufficient for systemic racism (the resume study needs no implicit bias to operate, and residential segregation reproduces itself through housing prices rather than through individual cognition), but the two interact in ways that matter for both diagnosis and intervention.

Historical and philosophical context Master

Race as a scientific and political category formed in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries alongside European colonialism and the Atlantic slave trade. Linnaeus's Systema Naturae (1735) classified human varieties; Blumenbach's 1795 division into Caucasian, Mongolian, Malayan, Ethiopian, and American varieties fixed the vocabulary that later race science would inherit. These taxonomies post-dated the slave trade they were invoked to justify; the categories were built to rationalize a political and economic order that already existed, which is why the biological case for race has always tracked the need for a biological case rather than the other way around.

Du Bois's The Souls of Black Folk (1903) gave the social construction of race its first sustained sociological treatment, framing the "color line" as the central problem of the twentieth century and the psychological wage of whiteness as the mechanism that divided the American working class against itself. The Chicago School of sociology in the 1920s and 1930s — Robert Park, E. Franklin Frazier, Charles Johnson — produced the first systematic empirical studies of racialized urban life, framed largely through assimilation theory (race as a cycle of contact, competition, accommodation, and assimilation). Gunnar Myrdal's An American Dilemma (1944), commissioned by the Carnegie Corporation, documented the gap between American creed and American practice; its liberal frame (the problem of White attitudes) drew criticism from Black scholars who located the problem in structure rather than in prejudice, and who rejected the assumption that the solution lay in White moral improvement.

The civil rights movement reshaped the field. The legal dismantling of Jim Crow made overt discrimination legally actionable, which posed the question that Bonilla-Silva's color-blind frame and the modern racism scales would later answer: how does racial hierarchy persist when its overt expression is discredited? The Black Power movement and Black studies programs in the late 1960s reframed assimilation as one possible goal among others, opening space for racial identity development theory and for the standpoint epistemology that would ground Collins's Black feminist thought. Crenshaw's 1989 article and the CRT collection of 1995 moved the analysis back into legal theory, arguing that the law was not only a remedy for racism but a constitutive site of racial construction — that the categories through which discrimination claims could be made (race, separately from gender) were themselves part of the apparatus that reproduced the disadvantage they were meant to address.

The genetic refutation of race-as-biology consolidated in the late twentieth century. The American Anthropological Association's 1998 statement and the findings of the Human Genome Project converged on the consensus that human genetic variation does not cluster into discrete racial groups, and that within-group variation exceeds between-group variation for any plausible grouping. This did not retire race as a social category; it relocated it. The standing philosophical question is whether the reproduction of racial hierarchy is unjust, and if so what may permissibly be done about it — a question that the positive analysis in this unit constrains but does not settle. What the empirical record does establish is that racial categories, however constructed, distribute life chances with a reliability that no defensible account of the society can ignore.

Bibliography Master

1. Alexander, M. (2010). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: New Press.

2. American Anthropological Association. (1998). "AAA Statement on Race." American Anthropologist, 100(3), 712–713.

3. American Psychological Association. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns. Washington, DC: APA.

4. Bauer, G. R. (2014). "Incorporating Intersectionality Theory into Population Health Research Methodology: Challenges and the Potential to Advance Health Equity." Social Science & Medicine, 110, 10–17.

5. Bell, D. (1992). Faces at the Bottom of the Well: The Permanence of Racism. New York: Basic Books.

6. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). "Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination." American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.

7. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2018). Racism Without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America (5th ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

8. Bonilla-Silva, E., & Forman, T. A. (2000). "'I Am Not a Racist But...': Mapping White College Students' Racial Ideology in the USA." Discourse & Society, 11(1), 50–85.

9. Bowleg, L. (2008). "When Black + Lesbian + Woman ≠ Black Lesbian Woman: The Methodological Challenges of Qualitative and Quantitative Intersectionality Research." Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 312–325.

10. Brodkin, K. (1998). How Jews Became White Folks and What That Says About Race in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

11. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

12. Crenshaw, K. (1989). "Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics." University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.

13. Crenshaw, K. (1991). "Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color." Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

14. Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (Eds.). (1995). Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement. New York: New Press.

15. Cross, W. E., Jr. (1971). "The Negro-to-Black Conversion Experience." Black World, 20(9), 12–27.

16. Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction (3rd ed.). New York: New York University Press.

17. Du Bois, W. E. B. (1903). The Souls of Black Folk. Chicago: A. C. McClurg.

18. Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2017). Sociology (8th ed.). Cambridge: Polity.

19. Gould, S. J. (1981). The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W. W. Norton.

20. Hancock, A.-M. (2007). "When Multiplication Doesn't Mean Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm." Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79.

21. Haney Lopez, I. F. (1996). White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race. New York: New York University Press.

22. Helms, J. E. (Ed.). (1990). Black and White Racial Identity: Theory, Research, and Practice. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

23. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.

24. Ignatiev, N. (1995). How the Irish Became White. New York: Routledge.

25. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

26. Krysan, M. (2002). "Community Heterogeneity and Race-Ethnicity in Attitudes Toward Residential Integration." Social Science Research, 31(4), 621–656.

27. Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995). "Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education." Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.

28. Lee, E. (2015). The Making of Asian America: A History. New York: Simon & Schuster.

29. Lee, J., & Zhou, M. (2015). The Asian American Achievement Paradox. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

30. Macionis, J. J. (2019). Sociology (17th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson.

31. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

32. McConahay, J. B. (1986). "Modern Racism, Ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale." In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism (pp. 91–125). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

33. McIntosh, P. (1988). "White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack." Peace and Freedom Magazine, July/August, 10–12.

34. Myrdal, G. (1944). An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.

35. Oliver, M. L., & Shapiro, T. M. (1995). Black Wealth/White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. New York: Routledge.

36. Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2015). Racial Formation in the United States (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

37. Pierson, E., Simoiu, C., Overgoor, J., Corbett-Davies, S., Jenson, D., Shoemaker, A., Ramachandran, V., & Goel, S. (2020). "A Large-Scale Analysis of Racial Disparities in Police Stops Across the United States." Nature Human Behaviour, 4(7), 736–745.

38. Roediger, D. R. (1991). The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class. London: Verso.

39. Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2005). "Over Thirty Years Later: A Contemporary Look at Symbolic Racism." Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 95–150.

40. Tatum, B. D. (1997). Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? And Other Conversations About Race. New York: Basic Books.

41. Telles, E. E. (2014). Pigmentocracies: Ethnicity, Race, and Color in Latin America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

42. Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). "Decolonization Is Not a Metaphor." Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.

43. Wolfe, P. (2006). "Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native." Journal of Genocide Research, 8(4), 387–409.