Finite fields — structure and squares
Anchor (Master): Serre 1973 *A Course in Arithmetic* Ch. I (originator-level concise treatment of finite fields, squares, and Frobenius); Lang 1965 *Algebra* Ch. V §5; Lidl-Niederreiter 1997 *Finite Fields* (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications 20, 2nd ed., Cambridge) Ch. 2; Ireland-Rosen 1990 *A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory* (Springer GTM 84, 2nd ed.) Ch. 7
Intuition Beginner
A finite field is a number system with finitely many elements in which you can add, subtract, multiply, and divide (except by zero) and the usual algebraic rules hold. The simplest finite field is , the two-element field with elements and addition that wraps around: . More generally, for any prime the integers modulo form a finite field with elements. These are the only finite fields whose size is prime, but they are far from the only finite fields.
The surprise is that finite fields with composite size also exist, but only when that size is a prime power. There is a field with elements, a field with elements, a field with elements, a field with elements, and so on through every power . There is no field with elements, no field with elements, no field with elements. The allowed sizes are exactly the prime powers, and for each prime power the field is unique up to renaming.
Why care? Finite fields are the building blocks of coding theory, of cryptography, of the geometry of algebraic curves over finite fields. They package arithmetic into a finite, computable shape that still satisfies the field axioms. The structure theorem for finite fields is the foundation on which Gauss sums, quadratic reciprocity, and modern number theory are built.
Visual Beginner
A schematic of the finite-field lattice for . The fields are drawn as nested rectangles, with sitting inside exactly when divides . The picture shows inside ? No — does not sit inside because does not divide . The lattice has on one branch and on another, with as the smallest containing both because is the least common multiple of and .
The picture captures the rule: sits inside exactly when divides , mirroring the divisor lattice of . The same picture in any characteristic has the same shape, with in place of .
Worked example Beginner
Build the field with four elements, list its multiplication table, and identify a primitive root.
Step 1. The four elements of are , where is a new symbol satisfying . The choice of comes from the polynomial , which is the unique degree- polynomial over with no root in (the other monic degree- polynomials , , all factor).
Step 2. Addition is componentwise modulo on the coefficients of . So , , , and so on. The additive group is , a Klein four-group.
Step 3. Multiplication uses (rearranging and recalling in characteristic ). So , , and (using ). The full multiplication table on the non-zero elements is:
Step 4. The three non-zero elements form a group of order under multiplication. Read off the powers: , , . So generates the multiplicative group; is a primitive root of .
Step 5. The Frobenius map acts on by , , , ? Recompute: . So swaps with and fixes . The fixed field of is , and , so has order , matching the degree .
What this tells us: a finite field of prime-power size is built by adjoining a root of an irreducible polynomial to the prime field, the multiplicative group is cyclic and generated by a primitive root, and Frobenius is the canonical generator of the field automorphism group with fixed field equal to the prime field.
Check your understanding Beginner
Formal definition Intermediate+
Let be a prime and an integer. A finite field of order is a field with exactly elements. The characteristic of is : the unique prime such that in , equivalently the additive order of the multiplicative identity.
The prime field of is the subfield generated by the multiplicative identity, isomorphic to as a ring. The inclusion gives the structure of an -vector space; since and , the dimension of this vector space is .
The multiplicative group is an abelian group of order under field multiplication.
The Frobenius endomorphism is the map $$ \phi : \mathbb{F}_q \to \mathbb{F}_q, \qquad \phi(x) = x^p. $$ It is a ring homomorphism because in characteristic (the binomial coefficients for vanish modulo ), and . The Frobenius is injective (kernel is a proper ideal in a field, hence the zero ideal) and since is finite, also surjective, so is a field automorphism of .
The Galois group is the group of field automorphisms of that fix every element of .
A non-zero element is a primitive root if it generates as a cyclic group, that is, .
When is odd, the squares in form the image of the squaring map on : $$ (\mathbb{F}_q^\times)^2 = {x^2 : x \in \mathbb{F}_q^\times} \subseteq \mathbb{F}_q^\times. $$ The Legendre-style character of in odd characteristic is the map $$ \chi : \mathbb{F}_q^\times \to {\pm 1}, \qquad \chi(x) = x^{(q-1)/2}, $$ which takes the value on squares and on non-squares.
Counterexamples to common slips
- The cyclicity of does not extend to the unit group of an arbitrary finite commutative ring. The unit group has four elements but is not cyclic; it is isomorphic to the Klein four-group, since every non-identity element has order . Cyclicity of uses the field property crucially, through the bound on the number of roots of .
- In characteristic , the squaring map on is the Frobenius and is a bijection, not a -to- map. Every element of with a power of is a square, and the squares-index- statement fails. The standing assumption odd in the squares discussion is load-bearing.
- The map has at most roots in a field, but in a non-field like the polynomial has four roots . The counting argument behind cyclicity breaks without the field hypothesis.
Key theorem with proof Intermediate+
Theorem (Structure of finite fields; Serre Course in Arithmetic Ch. I §1). Let be a prime and an integer. Set .
- (Existence and uniqueness.) There exists a field of order , namely the splitting field of over . Any two fields of order are isomorphic over .
- (Cyclicity.) The multiplicative group is cyclic of order .
- (Frobenius generates the Galois group.) The Frobenius automorphism has order in , and is cyclic of order . The fixed field of is exactly .
- (Squares, odd.) When is odd, the squaring map has kernel of size and image of index , so .
Proof.
Part 1 — Existence. Take the polynomial . Its formal derivative is (because is a power of so ), which is a non-zero constant. So in , and has distinct roots in any field where it splits completely.
Let be the splitting field of over . Let be the set of roots of in . The set is closed under field operations: if then so ; by iteration of the Frobenius identity, so ; the elements and are in ; and if then so . Therefore is a subfield of of cardinality (since has distinct roots and they exhaust ). The splitting field is generated over by these roots, so , and has exactly elements.
Part 1 — Uniqueness. Conversely, let be any field of order . Its characteristic is (the additive order of divides , so it is a power of ; being prime, it equals ), so contains . The group has order , so every satisfies by Lagrange's theorem applied to the order of in the multiplicative group, hence , and this identity extends to . Thus every element of is a root of , and since has at most roots in a field, the elements of are exactly its roots. So is a splitting field of over , and splitting fields of a fixed polynomial over a fixed base field are unique up to isomorphism.
Part 2 — Cyclicity. We prove the more general statement that every finite subgroup of , for any field , is cyclic. Let . For every , the number of elements of order dividing in is at most , since these elements are roots of in and a degree- polynomial has at most roots in a field. The number of elements of order exactly in a cyclic group of order is (Euler totient); in any group of order the number of elements of order is either or a multiple of , and the sum over of the latter equals . Combining with the bound, each for which has an element of order contributes exactly such elements; the identity forces every divisor to contribute, in particular , giving an element of order , so is cyclic.
Applied to of order , this yields the cyclicity claim.
Part 3 — Frobenius. The Frobenius is a field automorphism of by the binomial-coefficient calculation in characteristic . The fixed elements of are exactly the roots of , which is a degree- polynomial with at most roots, and already provides such roots (every element of satisfies by Fermat's little theorem). So the fixed field of is exactly .
The iterate is the identity on iff for every , that is, iff . The right side is a subfield of order at most , so the inclusion forces , hence . Conversely for every , the last equality by Part 1. So has order exactly .
The group has order by the Galois correspondence applied to the separable extension (separability holds because is separable, as computed in Part 1). The cyclic subgroup already has order , so .
Part 4 — Squares. Assume is odd. The squaring map , , is a group homomorphism with kernel . Since is a field and is odd, , so the kernel is of order .
By the first isomorphism theorem, the image has order , hence index in .
Bridge. The theorem builds toward every modern statement about that arises in number theory, algebraic geometry over finite fields, and coding theory. The central insight is that the splitting field of is exactly the set of fixed points of the -fold iterate of Frobenius, which putting these together identifies with the fixed field of acting on the algebraic closure . This is exactly the foundational reason the Galois group is the profinite completion , topologically generated by Frobenius, and the cyclic Galois groups are quotients of .
The squares-index-two statement is dual to the existence of a non-identity multiplicative character , and the central insight of Gauss's analytic proof of quadratic reciprocity is that this character, paired with an additive character through the Gauss sum , satisfies the quadratic identity . This pattern of pairing a multiplicative character with an additive one appears again in 21.03.01 (Riemann zeta and Dirichlet ) and in 21.02.02 (quadratic reciprocity via Gauss sums). The bridge is the recognition that finite-field structure underlies every local question in number theory: is the residue field of , for a prime power is the residue field of any local field of equal characteristic or mixed characteristic with residue field of size , and Frobenius lifts to the local Galois group. The same structural picture generalises through the function-field side of the Langlands programme, where varieties over have -adic cohomology on which Frobenius acts, and the Weil conjectures package the resulting eigenvalues into zeta-function data.
Exercises Intermediate+
Advanced results Master
Theorem (Wedderburn's little theorem; Wedderburn 1905 Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 6, 349-352). Every finite division ring is commutative; equivalently, the only finite skew fields are the finite fields .
The cleanest modern proof, due to Witt 1931 Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 8, 413 [source pending], is a three-page counting argument on the class equation of for a finite division ring. Let where is the order of the centre . The class equation gives , where the sum is over conjugacy classes of non-central elements and are the dimensions of the centralisers, each a proper divisor of . The cyclotomic polynomial divides each summand and divides on the left, hence divides on the right. For , (a direct estimate when and ranges over primitive th roots of unity off the real line). This forces , so is commutative.
The proof is essentially character-theoretic in disguise: the cyclotomic factor comes from the factorisation , and the divisibility uses that has no common factor with for , . Lidl-Niederreiter 1997 Finite Fields Ch. 2 [source pending] gives the full argument with the elementary estimate of .
Theorem (Galois correspondence for ). Let . The map from subgroups of to intermediate subfields is an order-reversing bijection. Under the identification , the subgroups are for , the corresponding fixed fields are , and the subfield lattice is anti-isomorphic to the divisor lattice of .
The result is the specialisation of the main theorem of Galois theory to the separable normal extension . The cyclic structure of the Galois group, together with the divisor-lattice combinatorics of , gives an unusually clean Galois correspondence: the field operations and the divisor combinatorics agree on the nose.
Theorem (Number of irreducible polynomials over of degree ). The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree in is $$ N_p(n) = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{d \mid n} \mu(n/d) p^d, $$ where is the Möbius function. Equivalently, , the product over all monic irreducible of degree ranging over divisors of .
The factorisation of comes from the identification as the splitting field. Each element of has minimal polynomial of degree some , and conversely each monic irreducible of degree over has all its roots in (specifically in ). Counting and inverting by Möbius yields the formula.
Theorem (Gauss sums and quadratic reciprocity; Gauss 1801 Disquisitiones Arithmeticae §356). Let be an odd prime, the quadratic Legendre character, and the standard additive character . The Gauss sum $$ g(\chi) = \sum_{x \in \mathbb{F}_p^\times} \chi(x) \psi(x) $$ satisfies , and via this identity Gauss's analytic proof of quadratic reciprocity reduces the law (for distinct odd primes) to the algebraic identity in the ring .
The Gauss-sum proof of quadratic reciprocity is the prototype of the analytic approach to reciprocity laws. The character-theoretic input is precisely the squares-index- statement of finite fields (without which there is no Legendre character), and the geometric input is the Pontryagin self-duality of (without which there is no orthogonality of additive characters). Ireland-Rosen 1990 Ch. 6-7 [source pending] develops the full proof and the higher-power generalisations (Jacobi sums, biquadratic reciprocity).
Theorem (Frobenius and the absolute Galois group of ). Let be a fixed algebraic closure of . Then , and the absolute Galois group $$ \mathrm{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{F}_p}/\mathbb{F}p) = \varprojlim_n \mathrm{Gal}(\mathbb{F}{p^n}/\mathbb{F}_p) = \varprojlim_n \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z} = \widehat{\mathbb{Z}} $$ is the profinite completion of , topologically generated by the Frobenius automorphism .
The profinite group is the abelianised completion of at all positive integer moduli, isomorphic to as a topological group with running over all primes. This is the prototype of a profinite Galois group, and the model for the absolute Galois group studied in modern number theory, whose abelianisation is by class field theory a quotient of an idele class group.
Synthesis. The finite-field structure theorem is the foundational reason every arithmetic statement over reduces to two facts: the splitting-field description of as the fixed field of , and the cyclic multiplicative group of order . The central insight is that putting these together gives both the existence-uniqueness statement and the Galois correspondence with the divisor lattice of in a single move. The squares-index- statement for odd identifies the kernel of the squaring map with , and the Legendre-style character is the dual character detecting squareness; this is dual to the analytic question of writing prime counting problems in terms of additive characters, where the multiplicative-additive pairing of the Gauss sum encodes the quadratic-reciprocity law in a single algebraic identity .
The bridge from the elementary structure theorem to modern number theory passes through three identifications. First, the absolute Galois group identifies the topological generator with Frobenius and packages every as the fixed field of . Second, the divisor-lattice subfield correspondence generalises through the function-field side of the Langlands programme to the étale fundamental group of a smooth curve over , where the Frobenius acts on -adic cohomology. Third, the squares-index- statement is the simplest case of the general structure of multiplicative characters , whose Pontryagin dual is again by Pontryagin duality of finite abelian groups, and whose pairing with additive characters via Gauss sums controls every analytic statement about .
Wedderburn's theorem is the structural corollary that one need not have separately considered "finite skew fields": every finite division ring is automatically commutative, so the entire arithmetic of finite division rings is exhausted by the structure theorem for . The Witt 1931 proof reduces commutativity to a cyclotomic-polynomial inequality on the class equation. The same cyclotomic-polynomial machinery, viewed from a different angle, controls the factorisation of the defining polynomial into irreducibles of all divisor degrees, and gives the Möbius-inversion count of irreducible polynomials of degree . The pattern recurs across the function-field analogue of number theory, where prime-power point counts on curves over are controlled by Frobenius eigenvalues on cohomology, and the Weil conjectures (proved by Deligne 1973) package the resulting analytic information into a zeta function whose functional equation and Riemann-hypothesis statement parallel the Riemann zeta function.
Full proof set Master
Proposition 1 (Witt's proof of Wedderburn). Every finite division ring is commutative.
Proof. Let be a finite division ring with centre , a field. Write , so is a -vector space of some dimension , . Assume toward a contradiction.
For each , the centraliser is a sub-division-ring of containing . As a -vector space, for some . Since is a -vector space, in the sense of dimensions, so .
The class equation of under conjugation gives $$ |D^\times| = |Z^\times| + \sum_a [D^\times : C(a)^\times], $$ the sum over conjugacy classes of non-central elements, with one representative per class. This reads $$ q^n - 1 = (q - 1) + \sum_a \frac{q^n - 1}{q^{d(a)} - 1}. $$
The cyclotomic polynomial divides in via the factorisation . So in . For each non-central conjugacy class with centraliser dimension and , also divides in : write and ; the quotient contains as a factor (since and for ).
So divides every summand of the class-equation right side and divides the left side , hence divides their difference, which is .
But over primitive th roots of unity . Each factor for and : if with and (which holds since ), then . For (which holds for ), this exceeds , so . Therefore (using ).
This contradicts , so and is commutative.
Proposition 2 (Cyclicity of every finite subgroup of ). For any field , every finite subgroup of the multiplicative group is cyclic.
Proof. Let . For each divisor , let . Then is a subgroup of contained in the set of roots of in , which has at most elements because is a field. So for every .
Let denote the number of elements of of order exactly . Then , so by Möbius inversion .
Suppose for some . Pick of order exactly . Then has elements all of order dividing , all in , so and , giving , a cyclic group of order . The number of generators of is , so when .
By the standard identity and the count (every element has some order), we get . Since and , the only way for the sum to vanish is for every . In particular , so contains an element of order , and is cyclic.
Proposition 3 (Frobenius fixed field). The Frobenius acting on for has fixed field exactly , and order exactly in .
Proof. For the fixed field: iff . The polynomial has degree , hence at most roots in . The elements of satisfy by Fermat's little theorem (the cyclic group has order , so for , hence ; for this is automatic). So , and the size bound gives equality .
For the order: . The identity on means for every , equivalently . The fixed field is the set of roots of in , which has at most elements. So , giving . Conversely for every (the multiplicative order of is , so for and extends to ). So , and the order of is exactly .
Proposition 4 (Squares index two). For with an odd prime, .
Proof. Consider the squaring homomorphism , . Its kernel is . Since is a field, this is . Since is odd, in , so the kernel has order .
By the first isomorphism theorem, , so . The index of the squares in is therefore .
Proposition 5 (Gauss sum identity). For an odd prime and the quadratic Legendre character (with ), .
Proof. Compute $$ g(\chi)^2 = \sum_{x, y \in \mathbb{F}_p^\times} \chi(x) \chi(y) \psi(x + y), $$ where . Substitute for ; as ranges over for each fixed , so does . Then (using ), and , so $$ g(\chi)^2 = \sum_{t \in \mathbb{F}p^\times} \chi(t) \sum{x \in \mathbb{F}_p^\times} \psi(x(1 + t)). $$
For the inner sum: if (i.e., ), then for all , and the sum over is . If , then as ranges over takes the same values (in some order) as for , and (sum of all th roots of unity), so .
So $$ g(\chi)^2 = \chi(-1)(p - 1) + \sum_{t \in \mathbb{F}p^\times, t \neq -1} \chi(t) \cdot (-1) = \chi(-1)(p - 1) - \sum{t \neq -1} \chi(t). $$ Adding and subtracting on the right gives $$ g(\chi)^2 = \chi(-1) p - \sum_{t \in \mathbb{F}p^\times} \chi(t). $$ The full character sum $\sum{t \in \mathbb{F}_p^\times} \chi(t)\chi\mathbb{F}p^\times\sum{t} \chi(t) = 0\chig(\chi)^2 = \chi(-1) p\square$
Connections Master
Field axioms and characteristic
01.01.01. A finite field is an instance of the field axioms, with the additional structural constraint that the underlying set is finite. The characteristic of a finite field is necessarily a prime , and the field contains a unique copy of as its prime field. Without the field axioms there is no setting for the squares-index-two statement or the Frobenius automorphism, since both rest on the field property (cancellation in field equations, bounded root count for polynomials, the squaring map as a group homomorphism).Algebraic field extension and splitting field
01.02.12. The field for is defined as the splitting field of over , an instance of the splitting-field construction in algebraic field extension theory. The Galois correspondence for specialises the general Galois correspondence to a cyclic group, with the divisor lattice of controlling the subfield lattice. Every result about finite fields ultimately rests on the splitting-field construction, and the simplicity of finite-field Galois theory is what makes them the basic object in number theory and algebraic geometry over finite ground rings.Quadratic reciprocity via Gauss sums
21.02.02. The squares-index-two statement for in odd characteristic produces a quadratic character , and the Gauss sum satisfies . This identity is the algebraic input to Gauss's analytic proof of quadratic reciprocity, packaged in unit 21.02.02. The finite-field unit supplies the character and the squares-index-two structural fact; the reciprocity unit takes those inputs and derives the symmetric law for odd primes .Riemann zeta function
21.03.01. The Euler product of the Riemann zeta function rests on unique factorisation in ; the analogous Hasse-Weil zeta function of a smooth projective variety is over closed points , where is the degree of the residue field of as an extension of . The function-field side of analytic number theory replaces by and reads off prime-power point counts of varieties via Frobenius eigenvalues on -adic cohomology. The basic ingredient is the finite-field structure theorem of the present unit.-adic Galois representations
21.05.01. The absolute Galois group is topologically generated by Frobenius, and the Frobenius eigenvalues on -adic cohomology of a smooth projective variety are algebraic integers of absolute value on (Deligne's Weil II 1980). The basic Frobenius automorphism of the present unit lifts to the relative Frobenius on schemes over , and the analysis of its eigenvalues on cohomology is the content of the Weil conjectures and the modern motivic-zeta-function programme.
Historical & philosophical context Master
Galois announced the construction of finite fields beyond the prime case in his 1830 Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques de Férussac note Sur la théorie des nombres [Galois 1830], six pages reprinted in his collected works in 1846 by Liouville. Galois fixed an irreducible polynomial over of degree and considered the elements in an indeterminate satisfying , with , working modulo . He observed that the resulting set is closed under the four field operations and has elements. The construction is the modern in its earliest published form, predating both Steinitz's general theory of fields and Dedekind's modern ideal-theoretic framework by half a century.
The construction left open whether the resulting field depended on the choice of . E. H. Moore resolved this in his 1893 paper A doubly-infinite system of simple groups in the Bulletin of the New York Mathematical Society 3 [Moore 1893]: any two finite fields of the same cardinality are -isomorphic. Moore's argument is the splitting-field description used in the modern proof. Dickson's 1901 Linear Groups, with an Exposition of the Galois Field Theory (Teubner) [Dickson 1901] gave the first systematic textbook treatment, with the Frobenius automorphism and the linear groups as a working tool of finite group theory. Steinitz's 1910 Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik paper Algebraische Theorie der Körper [Steinitz 1910] absorbed finite fields into a general field-theoretic framework distinguishing algebraic from transcendental extensions, separable from inseparable, and prepared the ground for Artin's 1927 modern packaging of Galois theory.
Wedderburn's 1905 Transactions of the American Mathematical Society paper A theorem on finite algebras [Wedderburn 1905] proved that every finite division ring is commutative, showing the entire arithmetic of finite skew fields collapses to the commutative case classified by Galois and Moore. The original proof was a somewhat lengthy argument on the structure of the multiplicative group; Witt's 1931 Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg note Über die Kommutativität endlicher Schiefkörper [source pending] reduced the proof to a three-line cyclotomic-polynomial argument on the class equation, which became the modern standard exposition. The squares-index-two structure of in odd characteristic and the resulting Legendre character originate with Euler's criterion (Euler 1755 Novi Commentarii Acad. Sci. Petrop. 8); Gauss's 1801 Disquisitiones Arithmeticae §§95-152 [Gauss 1801] gave four proofs of quadratic reciprocity, with the §356 analytic proof through Gauss sums becoming the prototype for higher reciprocity laws and the analytic side of class field theory.
Bibliography Master
@article{Galois1830,
author = {Galois, {\'E}variste},
title = {Sur la th{\'e}orie des nombres},
journal = {Bulletin des Sciences Math{\'e}matiques de F{\'e}russac},
volume = {13},
year = {1830},
pages = {428--435},
note = {Reprinted in \emph{{\OE}uvres math{\'e}matiques de {\'E}variste Galois}, ed.\ Liouville, J.\ Math.\ Pures Appl.\ 11 (1846), 381--444}
}
@article{Moore1893,
author = {Moore, E. H.},
title = {A doubly-infinite system of simple groups},
journal = {Bulletin of the New York Mathematical Society},
volume = {3},
year = {1893},
pages = {73--78}
}
@article{Wedderburn1905,
author = {Wedderburn, J. H. M.},
title = {A theorem on finite algebras},
journal = {Transactions of the American Mathematical Society},
volume = {6},
year = {1905},
pages = {349--352}
}
@article{Witt1931,
author = {Witt, Ernst},
title = {{\"U}ber die Kommutativit{\"a}t endlicher Schiefk{\"o}rper},
journal = {Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universit{\"a}t Hamburg},
volume = {8},
year = {1931},
pages = {413}
}
@book{Dickson1901,
author = {Dickson, Leonard Eugene},
title = {Linear Groups, with an Exposition of the Galois Field Theory},
publisher = {B. G. Teubner},
address = {Leipzig},
year = {1901}
}
@article{Steinitz1910,
author = {Steinitz, Ernst},
title = {Algebraische Theorie der K{\"o}rper},
journal = {Journal f{\"u}r die reine und angewandte Mathematik},
volume = {137},
year = {1910},
pages = {167--309}
}
@book{Gauss1801,
author = {Gauss, Carl Friedrich},
title = {Disquisitiones Arithmeticae},
publisher = {Fleischer},
address = {Leipzig},
year = {1801}
}
@book{Serre1973CinA,
author = {Serre, Jean-Pierre},
title = {A Course in Arithmetic},
publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
series = {Graduate Texts in Mathematics},
volume = {7},
year = {1973}
}
@book{Lang2002Algebra,
author = {Lang, Serge},
title = {Algebra},
edition = {3rd revised},
publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
series = {Graduate Texts in Mathematics},
volume = {211},
year = {2002}
}
@book{LidlNiederreiter1997,
author = {Lidl, Rudolf and Niederreiter, Harald},
title = {Finite Fields},
edition = {2nd},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
series = {Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications},
volume = {20},
year = {1997}
}
@book{IrelandRosen1990,
author = {Ireland, Kenneth and Rosen, Michael},
title = {A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory},
edition = {2nd},
publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
series = {Graduate Texts in Mathematics},
volume = {84},
year = {1990}
}
@book{DummitFoote2004,
author = {Dummit, David S. and Foote, Richard M.},
title = {Abstract Algebra},
edition = {3rd},
publisher = {John Wiley \& Sons},
year = {2004}
}